How to price design work

Design gets underpriced because clients can see the file but not the thinking. Here's how to price the work so revisions, taste, and scope creep stop eating your margin.

What you're actually selling

Not pixels or pages. A business that looks credible enough to charge more, convert better, or be taken seriously by the people it needs to impress. The file is the delivery format.

Why designers get this wrong

Clients price design by countable things — pages, logos, screens, revisions — because those are the only parts they can see. Quote that way and you've agreed to be paid for volume while being judged on judgement. It also guarantees the 'can we just try one more version' conversation, unpaid.

How to work out your number

  1. Price the outcome the design has to produce

    A brand identity for a company raising investment and one for a local café are the same number of files and wildly different jobs. Ask what the design has to achieve commercially before you scope a single deliverable.

  2. Scope revisions explicitly, in writing

    Two rounds included, further rounds charged at a stated rate. This isn't hostility, it's the thing that stops an open-ended project. Clients respect a boundary far more than they respect a designer who quietly absorbs the fourth revision.

  3. Write the exclusion list before you write the price

    Name what isn't included — extra concepts, copywriting, stock licensing, print management, ongoing edits. Everything you leave unsaid will be assumed to be included, and you'll find out at the worst moment.

  4. Separate the design from the rights

    Full ownership, exclusivity, and unlimited usage are worth money and should be priced as such. If a client wants to buy the work outright, that's a different quote from a licence to use it.

Pricing models that fit designers

Think twice about: Hourly rate

It punishes the designer whose first concept is right and rewards the one who flails for a week. It also makes every revision a billing argument.

Mistakes that cost you money

  • Quoting per page or per logo, which prices the file and ignores the thinking.
  • Offering unlimited revisions to seem accommodating, then working for free from round three onward.
  • Handing over source files and full rights without pricing the transfer.
  • Taking on 'quick tweaks' after delivery for nothing, and training the client to expect free maintenance.

Ask these before you quote

  • What is this design supposed to change about the business?
  • Who has final sign-off, and how many people are in that room?
  • Do you need the source files and full ownership, or a licence to use the work?
  • What's the deadline, and what's driving it?

Designers: frequently asked questions

How much should I charge for a logo or brand identity?

#

It depends far more on what the brand has to do than on how many files you hand over. A brand that has to hold up in retail, in a funding pitch, or across a franchise carries commercial weight that a hobby project doesn't. Scope the deliverables, then price against the stakes.

Should designers charge hourly or per project?

#

Per project, in almost every case. Hourly billing penalises you for getting the first concept right and turns every revision into an argument about time. A fixed fee with a written revision limit protects both sides.

How do I stop scope creep on design projects?

#

Write down what's included, what isn't, and how many revision rounds the fee covers, before any work starts. When a request falls outside it, quote it as a change request in writing. The problem is almost always a scoping failure, not a client failure.

Should I charge more for full ownership of the design?

#

Yes. Transferring copyright, granting exclusivity, or allowing unlimited usage removes options you'd otherwise keep. Price the default as a licence for the agreed use, and treat full ownership as a priced upgrade.

Get the deep dives

Worked examples and scripts for every pricing model. No spam.